In fact, I'm not bothered by this dislocation between retaining (not preserving - retaining) long-term values and keeping up with what's novel. It seems to me it's a healthy place to be, that tug back against a too ready acceptance of the new. Remember the craze for CB radio?
Today's FT carries a feature on an innovative use of technology by Boston University School of Management, where they are bringing live contributions from business leaders into classroom project work and case discussion. The article identifies how this radically alters the role of faculty from 'sage on the stage' to 'guide on the side'. It certainly looks like the BU faculty and students benefit from this digitally enhanced learning and it reinforces my own sense that moving from sage to guide chimes precisely with the strengths of the case method so that case discussion is positioned strongly to take advantage of new technologies (whatever they might be), and in any event certainly better than other approaches to teaching and learning.
The article quotes Ellen Rubin, vice-president at Terremark, "No matter how well the case is written, to hear from someone who was in the trenches and had to make a decision, there's no comparison". I take that as a call to take advantage of the opportunities technologies give us to develop the case method rather than replace it.
No comments:
Post a Comment